Skip navigation

PLN comment to TN Office of Open Records Counsel re public records policy - Dec 2016

Download original document:
Brief thumbnail
This text is machine-read, and may contain errors. Check the original document to verify accuracy.
Dedicated to Protecting Human Rights

Please Reply To:

Direct Dial: 615-495-6568
5331 Mt. View Rd. #130
Antioch, TN 37013

December 14, 2016

Comptroller of the Treasury
Office of Open Records Counsel
505 Deaderick Street, Suite 1700
Nashville, TN 37243-1402

Re: Public Comment on Proposed Model Public Records Policy
Dear Sir or Madam:
I serve as managing editor of Prison Legal News, a monthly publication that reports on criminal
justice-related issues and a project of the Human Rights Defense Center. I manage our office in
Nashville and submit these comments regarding the proposed model public records policy.
We file numerous public records requests in Tennessee in connection with our news reporting, and
litigate violations of the public records law by government agencies or their functional equivalents.
See, for example, the Tenn. Court of Appeals rulings at Friedmann v. CCA, 310 S.W.3d 366 (Tenn.
Ct. App. 2009) and Friedmann v. Marshall County, 471 S.W.3d 427 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2015).
With respect to the proposed model public records policy, we offer the following comments:

Public records requests received by email should always be honored. Email is now an
integral part of the way people communicate, and so long as government agencies use email
to facilitate their own internal and external communications, there is no legitimate reason
why public records requests should not be accepted when submitted by email.


Public records should be produced in the format requested if they are already in, or can be
easily converted to, that format. For example, electronic records should be produced as
computer files and records should be faxed upon request. Providing records in electronic
format or by fax reduces costs to the public agency and to citizens.


Private entities that are the functional equivalent of government agencies should be required
to comply with public records requests to the same extent as government agencies. Public
agencies should develop rules that specify when private entities must comply.
PLN is a project of the Human Rights Defense Center


Government agencies should be encouraged to create protocols for waiving fees for public
records requests, particularly when the costs are low; waivers should also be considered for
members of the media when the records are to be used to serve the public through news


Although this is beyond the scope of the proposed model policy, violations of the public
records statute that result in the denial of public records should result in the mandatory, not
discretionary, assessment of attorney fees and costs against the agency that commits the
violation if the requester files a successful court challenge. If the assessment of attorney fees
and costs is mandatory, government agencies and their functional equivalents will be less
likely to violate the public records law.

Thank you for your time and attention in this regard;


Alex Friedmann
Managing Editor, PLN

PLN is a project of the Human Rights Defense Center