Centurion of FL v. HRDC, FL, Exhibit C to Declaration, Public Records Request, 2022
Download original document:
This text is machine-read, and may contain errors. Check the original document to verify accuracy.
Filing # 162200613 E-Filed 12/01/2022 02:30:01 PM EXHIBIT C Filing # 129041728 E-Filed 06/18/2021 12:21:11 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. CACE19025141 DIVISION 03 JUDGE Nicholas Lopane Human Rights Defense Center, Inc. Plaintiff(s) / Petitioner(s) v. Centurion of Florida, LLC, et al Defendant(s) / Respondent(s) ____________________________/ ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND ISSUING AN ALTERNATE WRIT OF MANDAMUS THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendants’/Respondents’ Motion to Dismiss Complaint and Petition for Mandamus. The Court, having reviewed the motion and the corresponding response and reply, having heard the argument of counsel, and otherwise being fully advised of the premises, hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: 1. Defendants Centurion of Florida, LLC and MHM Health Professionals, LLC Motion to Dismiss Complaint and Petition for Mandamus is DENIED. The Court has considered the Complaint/Petition filed pursuant to Rule 1.630, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and/or Rule 9.100, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. After reviewing the Complaint/Petition, the Court finds that it shows a preliminary basis for relief and hereby issues an alternative writ of mandamus. Therefore, it is further ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: 2. Defendants/Respondents shall within thirty (30) calendar days of this order, show cause why Plaintiff/Petitioner’s petition should not be granted. See Brown v. State, 93 So. 3d 1194 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012); Miami-Dade Cnty. Bd. of Cnty. Comm’rs v. An Accountable Miami-Dade, 208 So.3d 724, 732-33 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016); Radford v. Brock, 914 So.2d CaseNo: CACE19025141 Page 2 of 2 1066, 1068-69 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). The Response must address the allegations made in the Petition/Complaint and include all documents or factual support necessary to establish the validity of the actions challenged by the Plaintiff/Petitioner. To the extent that no cause exists to deny Plaintiff/Petitioner access to the public records at issue, then Defendants/Respondents shall forthwith produce the requested records subject to any statutory exemptions or appropriate redactions. If Plaintiff/Petitioner chooses to file a Reply to Defendants/Respondents’ Response, then it shall have thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of Defendant/Respondent’s Response to file its Reply to the same. The parties shall thereafter coordinate to set the matter for a case management conference on the Court’s docket for purposes of scheduling an evidentiary hearing on any disputed factual issues or other deadlines. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, at Broward County, Florida on 06-18-2021. CACE19025141 06-18-2021 10:55 AM Hon. Nicholas Lopane CIRCUIT JUDGE Electronically Signed by Nicholas Lopane Copies Furnished To: Daniel Marshall , E-mail : email@example.com Daniel Marshall , E-mail : firstname.lastname@example.org Diana Evans , E-mail : email@example.com Eric Taylor , E-mail : firstname.lastname@example.org Eric Taylor , E-mail : email@example.com Masimba Mutamba Mutamba , E-mail : firstname.lastname@example.org Robert C. Mayfield , E-mail : email@example.com Robert C. Mayfield , E-mail : firstname.lastname@example.org Robert C. Mayfield , E-mail : email@example.com Sabarish P Neelakanta , E-mail : firstname.lastname@example.org Sabarish P Neelakanta , E-mail : email@example.com